The LMA locates numerous VHF sources from the lightning activity, which can be grouped into individual flashes either manually using special analysis software or through an automated algorithm such Full PDF Package Download Full PDF Package. This Paper. A short summary of this paper. 37 Full PDFs related to this paper. (GraphPad Age 6.32±3 years 4.47±2 years Software, San Diego, CA, (1.5, 2 and ProSeal™ with LMA Classic™ in anaesthetised paralysed children. Indian J Anesth 2008; The LMA Classic ™ laryngeal mask airway (cLMA; Laryngeal Mask Company Ltd, Nicosia, Cyprus) is an airway device that allows unobstructed breathing and ventilation without the need to hold a face mask or intubate the patient [1, 2].Insertion of the cLMA requires some degree of skill. If malpositioned it can obstruct the airway and inadequate depth of anaesthesia may result in the patient Ö. Comparison of i-gel, LMA-supreme, LMA-classic and LMA-proseal as conduits of endotracheal intubation in newborns and infants: A manikin study. Turk J Pediatr 2019; 61: 166-173. Many types of supraglottic airway devices (SAD) including the traditional LMA (Laryngeal Mask Airway) are commonly used as conduits for intubation The LMA Flexible is more difficult to insert compared with the standard LMA Classic because pressure cannot be directly transmitted along the soft flexometallic stem . Suggested techniques for LMA Flexible insertion include the use of the stylet [ 9 ], spatula introducer [ 10 ], Bosworth introducer [ 11 ] and the Flexiguide introducer [ 12 ]. A cross-sectional analysis was performed upon 1061 Chinese CP patients between 2010 and 2015. CP was classified as classical alcoholic CP (ACP; n=206), LMA-CP (n=154), and idiopathic CP (ICP; n=701). Clinical features and genetic characteristics (PRSS1, SPINK1, CTRC, CFTR variant status) were compared between the different groups. Coughing was less frequent after early removal of the LMA, with a risk of 13.9% as compared to the risk of 19.4% after late removal of the LMA. However, airway obstruction was more likely after early removal, with a risk of 15.6%, as compared to a risk of 4.6% after late removal of the LMA. All data analysis was carried out using the professional meta-analysis software, RevMan (V5.1.0; Cochrane Collaboration). Given that different RCTs determined leak pressure using different techniques and in different head positions, we performed subgroup analysis of technique and head positioning. 3. Results 3.1. of previous studies with the LMA-classic may not be applicable to the LMA-ProSeal. We conducted a parallel group randomised trial to study the effects of maintaining cuff pressure below 60 cm H 2O on postoperative pharyn-golaryngeal adverse effects following LMA-ProSeal insertion. Methods This study was carried out after approval from the Insti- IRI Voracity is an end-to-end software platform for fast, affordable, and ergonomic data lifecycle management. Voracity speeds, consolidates, and often combines the key activities of data discovery, integration, migration, governance, and analytics in a single pane of glass, built on Eclipse™. Through its revolutionary convergence of. s. Comparing LMA-Classic with the LMA-Fastrach, no sig-nificantly faster placement could be shown. Numbers of attempts until correct placement were 1.1 ± 0.52 for the LMA-Classic and 1.4 ± 0.95 for the LMA-Fastrach. The measured tidal volume was 777 ± 367 ml for the LMA-Classic. For the LMA-Fastrach, a tidal volume of 1018 ± 50 ml was